Athlete performing a standing barbell overhead press
Training Guides22 min read

The Perfect Overhead Press: A Science-Based Guide to Form, Variations, and Individual Differences

Master the overhead press with evidence-based guidance on proper form, how your anatomy affects technique, and which variations are best for building shoulder strength and size.

Marcus Chen
Marcus Chen

Introduction – Why the Overhead Press Matters

The overhead press, often called the strict press or military press, represents one of the most fundamental human movement patterns: pushing an object overhead. Throughout human history, we've needed to place objects on high shelves, lift tools and materials above our heads, and defend ourselves by pressing objects away at various angles. Despite being somewhat neglected in modern fitness culture—overshadowed by its horizontal cousin, the bench press—the overhead press remains an irreplaceable exercise for building genuine upper body strength, shoulder health, and functional pressing power.[1][2]

From a strength and performance perspective, the overhead press is unmatched in its ability to build complete shoulder development and pressing strength. Unlike machine-based movements or the bench press (which allows significant leg and back support), the standing overhead press is a true full-body compound movement that demands coordinated effort from virtually every muscle in the body: the deltoids (all three heads), triceps, upper chest, upper back (traps and rhomboids), core musculature, and even the legs and glutes for stabilization. Research demonstrates that the overhead press produces among the highest levels of deltoid activation across all three heads—anterior, lateral, and posterior—making it superior to isolation movements for comprehensive shoulder development.[3][4][5]

Beyond muscle building, the overhead press offers unique benefits for shoulder health and injury prevention when performed correctly. The vertical pressing pattern strengthens the rotator cuff muscles, improves scapular stability, and enhances shoulder mobility through a full range of motion.[6][7] These adaptations are particularly valuable for overhead athletes (volleyball players, swimmers, baseball pitchers) and anyone seeking to maintain shoulder function and resilience with age.

Biomechanical analysis reveals that the overhead press trains the shoulder in its most mechanically disadvantaged position—with the arm fully elevated—making it one of the most effective exercises for developing genuine overhead strength and stability.[8]

Info

The overhead press also provides important diagnostic information about movement quality and potential dysfunction. Dr. Mark Rippetoe, author of Starting Strength, notes that "the press is a supremely honest barometer of upper body strength and full-body coordination. You can't cheat it with excessive leg drive, back arching, or momentum—it's just you, the bar, and gravity."

However, as with the squat and deadlift, the concept of a "perfect overhead press" must account for significant individual variation. Optimal overhead press form varies between individuals based on unique anatomical factors including arm length, shoulder socket orientation, thoracic spine mobility, and torso proportions. As shoulder biomechanics researcher Dr. Michael Reinold explains, "The shoulder is the most mobile joint in the human body, but this mobility comes with tremendous anatomical variation between individuals. What allows one person to press efficiently may cause impingement or discomfort in another."[10]

In this comprehensive guide, we'll explore the science behind the overhead press—covering proper biomechanics, the critical role of individual anatomy in determining your ideal technique, evidence-based comparisons of different pressing variations (strict press vs. push press, standing vs. seated, barbell vs. dumbbell), and practical programming strategies. Most importantly, we'll help you discover your perfect overhead press technique.

Biomechanics of a Proper Overhead Press

While individual variations exist based on anatomy, certain biomechanical principles apply to all effective overhead presses. Understanding these fundamentals provides the foundation for developing your own optimal technique. A properly executed standing barbell overhead press typically begins with the bar resting on the anterior deltoids (front of shoulders) with hands gripped slightly wider than shoulder-width apart—generally just outside the shoulders. The exact grip width varies by individual, but research suggests that a grip approximately 1.5 times shoulder width optimizes deltoid activation while minimizing elbow and wrist strain.[11][12]

Starting Position and Bar Path

The bar should start in contact with the upper chest/clavicle region, resting on the anterior deltoids. From this position, the bar must travel in a perfectly vertical line. Unlike the bench press where the bar can travel at an angle, the overhead press demands true vertical bar displacement to minimize inefficient moment arms and maximize force application.[13] Elite weightlifters demonstrate near-perfect vertical bar paths during overhead pressing movements, with minimal horizontal deviation.[14]

Head Position and Timing

One of the most distinctive features of the overhead press is the need to move the head backward to allow the bar to pass the face, then forward through the "window" created by the arms as the bar reaches overhead. This sequence is critical: as the bar passes chin height, the head and torso shift slightly backward; once the bar clears the head, the lifter drives forward, finishing with the head through the arms and the bar positioned directly over the mid-foot.

Biomechanical analysis confirms this head movement is essential for maintaining vertical bar path.[15]

Pro Tip

The common cue is: "bar up, head back; bar up, head through."

Torso Position

A slight backward lean (approximately 5-10 degrees) at the start of the press is biomechanically necessary to allow the bar to clear the face while maintaining balance over the mid-foot.[16] However, excessive backward lean transforms the press into an incline press and reduces deltoid involvement while increasing lower back stress. The torso should progressively become more vertical as the bar rises, finishing in a fully stacked position with the bar over the head, shoulders, hips, and mid-foot all in vertical alignment.

Core and Glute Engagement

The standing overhead press demands tremendous core stability. Before initiating the press, take a deep breath into the abdomen and create intra-abdominal pressure (IAP) by bracing the entire torso. Simultaneously, squeeze the glutes forcefully to prevent excessive lumbar extension and maintain a neutral pelvis.[17][18]

Research demonstrates that core activation during overhead pressing is actually higher than during many dedicated "core exercises," making the press valuable for developing real-world trunk stability.[19] Many experienced lifters find a weightlifting belt helpful for heavier presses, as it provides tactile feedback and enhances IAP.

Scapular Mechanics

Proper scapular movement is essential for shoulder health during overhead pressing. As the bar moves upward, the scapulae should upwardly rotate and slightly elevate—this is natural shoulder biomechanics for overhead reaching.[20] The common cue to "pack the shoulders down" or "depress the scapulae" throughout the entire press contradicts natural shoulder mechanics and can actually increase impingement risk.

Instead, allow the scapulae to move naturally while maintaining tension in the traps and upper back. At the top position, active scapular elevation (shrugging the shoulders upward) is not only safe but beneficial for maximizing range of motion and trap development.[21]

Lockout Position

At full lockout, the bar should be positioned directly over the mid-foot with the arms fully extended (elbows locked), shoulders actively shrugged upward, and the head pushed through the arms so the ears are visible from the side. The entire body forms a vertical line from feet to bar. This "stacked" position is both the strongest and safest, minimizing joint stress.[24]

The Shoulder Impingement Debate: Is the Overhead Press Dangerous?

One of the most pervasive concerns about the overhead press is the potential for shoulder impingement—compression of the rotator cuff tendons and bursa between the humeral head and acromion process. Some fitness professionals have even declared overhead pressing inherently dangerous and recommended avoiding it entirely. However, the science tells a more nuanced story.

Shoulder impingement risk factors are primarily related to poor technique, pre-existing anatomical abnormalities, or inadequate shoulder mobility—not to overhead pressing itself.[26] Research shows that when performed with proper form, the overhead press actually follows the natural scapulohumeral rhythm and promotes healthy shoulder mechanics.[27][28] The key is achieving adequate scapular upward rotation: as the arm elevates, the scapula must rotate upward approximately 60 degrees to prevent the humeral head from colliding with the acromion.[29]

Problems arise when lifters demonstrate scapular dyskinesis—abnormal scapular movement patterns. Common dysfunctions include inadequate upward rotation, excessive anterior tilting, or premature elevation without rotation. These patterns are often caused by weakness in the lower trapezius and serratus anterior combined with overactivity of the upper trapezius and levator scapulae.[30]

Warning

Thoracic spine mobility also plays a critical role. Adequate thoracic extension (approximately 25-30 degrees) is necessary to achieve full overhead range of motion without compensatory excessive lumbar extension or shoulder internal rotation. Lifters with limited thoracic mobility often compensate by over-arching the lower back or failing to achieve full lockout overhead, both of which increase injury risk.

The Practical Takeaway

The overhead press is not inherently dangerous and can actually promote shoulder health when performed correctly by individuals with adequate mobility. However, if you experience pain (not to be confused with muscular discomfort) during overhead pressing, this indicates either a technique issue or an underlying mobility/stability limitation that needs to be addressed.

The solution is not necessarily to avoid overhead pressing entirely, but to:

  1. Assess and improve thoracic spine mobility
  2. Develop proper scapular control and upward rotation
  3. Address any existing rotator cuff weakness
  4. Consider alternative pressing angles (such as landmine press or incline press) while working on mobility
  5. Ensure proper pressing technique, particularly head and torso positioning

Anthropometry and Individual Differences in Overhead Press Form

Just as deadlift and squat technique must be individualized based on anatomy, overhead press form varies significantly between individuals due to anthropometric differences. Understanding how your unique structure influences your optimal pressing mechanics is essential for maximizing performance while minimizing injury risk.

Arm Length and Torso Proportions

Lifters with longer arms relative to torso length face a greater mechanical disadvantage: the bar must travel a longer distance, and the moment arm between the shoulder joint and the bar is extended throughout more of the range of motion.[33] These lifters typically benefit from:

  • A slightly wider grip to reduce the distance the bar must travel
  • Greater emphasis on leg drive assistance (push press variation)
  • More conservative loading and higher repetition ranges to manage joint stress
  • Careful attention to shoulder mobility work

Conversely, lifters with shorter arms relative to torso length have a mechanical advantage in overhead pressing. These individuals can often press more weight relative to body weight and may tolerate heavier, lower-rep training more effectively.

Shoulder Socket Orientation

Shoulder socket orientation varies considerably between individuals due to differences in the angle and version (rotation) of the glenoid fossa. Some individuals have anteriorly oriented shoulder sockets that favor pushing movements, while others have more posteriorly oriented sockets that favor pulling movements.[34]

This anatomical variation helps explain why some people are naturally "good pressers" while others struggle despite similar training. There's no way to change your socket orientation, but understanding your natural predisposition can help set realistic expectations and guide exercise selection.

Sex Differences

Beyond the obvious difference in absolute strength, research shows that women typically demonstrate:

  • Greater relative shoulder flexibility and range of motion[37]
  • Different muscle recruitment patterns during pressing (relatively greater deltoid vs. triceps activation)[38]
  • Higher injury rates related to shoulder instability rather than impingement[39]

These differences don't change the fundamental mechanics of the press, but may influence programming, accessory exercise selection, and areas requiring particular attention for injury prevention.

Info

The key principle: There is no single "perfect" overhead press technique that applies universally. Your optimal form depends on your unique anatomical structure, mobility profile, and training goals. Experimentation within the framework of sound biomechanical principles is essential.

Overhead Press Variations: An Evidence-Based Comparison

The overhead press encompasses several distinct variations, each with unique advantages, disadvantages, and optimal applications.

Strict Press vs. Push Press

The strict press requires pressing the bar overhead using only upper body strength, with the legs remaining relatively static. This variation maximizes:

  • Pure shoulder and triceps strength development[40]
  • Time under tension for hypertrophy
  • Shoulder stability requirements
  • Technical skill development

The push press incorporates a deliberate leg drive (dip and drive from the knees and hips) to generate momentum and assist in moving the bar overhead. Biomechanical analysis reveals that the push press allows approximately 10-30% more load to be pressed compared to strict pressing.[41]

Research comparing muscle activation between strict press and push press shows that the strict press produces higher sustained deltoid and triceps activation, while the push press produces greater peak force and power output.[43][44] Neither variation is categorically superior—they serve different training purposes.

Practical application: For maximizing pressing strength and shoulder hypertrophy, the strict press should form the foundation of training. The push press serves as an excellent variation for overload work and developing explosive power.

Standing vs. Seated Overhead Press

The standing press is a true full-body movement requiring core stability, leg tension, and total-body coordination. EMG studies demonstrate significantly higher core activation (rectus abdominis, obliques, erector spinae) during standing versus seated pressing.[45][46]

The seated press isolates the upper body more completely by removing the core stability requirement and eliminating leg drive. Research shows the seated press typically allows approximately 10-15% less load compared to standing pressing.[47]

Practical application: The standing press is generally superior for overall strength development, athletic transfer, and functional capacity. The seated press serves as a valuable accessory for targeted shoulder work or for individuals with lower back concerns.

Barbell vs. Dumbbell Overhead Press

The barbell press allows heavier loading due to bilateral stability and is easier to progress with small weight increments. The dumbbell press provides:

  • Greater range of motion (dumbbells can descend lower than a barbell)[48]
  • More natural pressing path (hands can rotate)
  • Identifies and addresses strength imbalances
  • Higher stability demands, potentially greater rotator cuff activation[49]

EMG research shows that while barbell and dumbbell pressing produce similar overall deltoid activation, dumbbell pressing generates notably higher activation in stabilizer muscles including the rotator cuff.[50]

Practical application: Both variations have merit. The barbell press should generally be the primary pressing movement for building maximal strength. Dumbbell pressing serves excellently as an accessory movement for additional volume and developing shoulder stability.

Overhead Press Programming: Volume, Intensity, and Frequency

Effective overhead press programming requires understanding the unique demands and recovery characteristics of overhead pressing movements.

Frequency Recommendations

  • Beginners (less than 1 year): 2-3x per week, focusing on technique with moderate loads
  • Intermediates (1-3 years): 2x per week primary pressing, with optional lighter accessory work
  • Advanced (3+ years): 1-2x per week primary pressing, with carefully programmed variation

Research on pressing frequency shows that for most intermediate and advanced lifters, overhead pressing 2-3 times per week produces superior strength gains compared to once weekly, but 4+ times per week typically leads to diminishing returns and increased injury risk.[55][56]

Volume Recommendations

Total sets per week across all sessions:

  • Beginners: 6-10 total work sets per week
  • Intermediates: 8-14 total work sets per week
  • Advanced: 10-16 total work sets per week

Research on muscle hypertrophy suggests that shoulder development responds well to weekly volumes in the 10-20 sets range, though optimal volume varies considerably between individuals.[57][58]

Intensity Recommendations (% of 1-rep max)

  • Strength focus: Primary work at 80-90% 1RM for 1-5 reps
  • Hypertrophy focus: Primary work at 65-80% 1RM for 6-12 reps
  • Strength-endurance: Accessory work at 60-70% 1RM for 10-15 reps

Periodization Strategies

Daily Undulating Periodization (DUP) is highly effective for intermediate and advanced pressers:

  • Day 1 (Heavy): Strict press, 80-90% for 2-5 reps, 4-6 sets
  • Day 2 (Light): Push press or seated press, 60-70% for 8-12 reps, 3-4 sets
  • Day 3 (Moderate, optional): Dumbbell press, 70-80% for 6-8 reps, 3-4 sets

Research demonstrates that DUP approaches can produce superior strength gains compared to traditional linear models, likely due to more frequent exposure to different loading patterns.[61][62]

Balancing Pressing with Pulling

A critical but often neglected aspect of shoulder health is maintaining an appropriate ratio between pressing and pulling volumes. Research suggests that for every set of pressing (horizontal and vertical combined), lifters should perform 1-1.5 sets of pulling exercises (rows, pull-ups, face pulls).[65] This balance prevents the anterior shoulder dominance that can develop from excessive pressing.

Conclusion

The overhead press remains an irreplaceable exercise for developing complete upper body strength, shoulder health, and functional pressing power. While often overshadowed by the bench press in modern fitness culture, the overhead press provides unique benefits that no other exercise can fully replicate.

Key Takeaways:

  1. Master the fundamentals: Vertical bar path, proper head movement timing, adequate core bracing, and natural scapular mechanics form the foundation of safe and effective pressing

  2. Respect individual differences: Experiment within sound biomechanical principles to discover your optimal grip width, stance, and pressing groove

  3. Program intelligently: Use appropriate frequency (typically 2x/week for intermediates), manage volume carefully, and balance pressing with adequate pulling work

  4. Utilize variations strategically: The strict press should form the foundation, but push press, seated variations, and dumbbell work all have valuable applications

  5. Address mobility proactively: Adequate thoracic spine extension and shoulder mobility are prerequisites for safe, effective overhead pressing

  6. Listen to your body: Pain during pressing indicates either a technique issue or an underlying limitation that needs to be addressed

The overhead press is not just an exercise—it's a fundamental human movement pattern that, when trained intelligently, builds strength, resilience, and functional capacity that transfers throughout life.

Get Training Tips in Your Inbox

Join thousands of athletes getting weekly insights on strength training, exercise science, and AI-powered coaching.

No spam. Unsubscribe at any time.


Cover photo by John Arano on Unsplash

Key Takeaways

  • The overhead press develops all three deltoid heads comprehensively
  • Vertical bar path is critical—the bar must travel straight up
  • Head movement timing is essential: "bar up, head back; bar up, head through"
  • Natural scapular upward rotation is healthy and necessary
  • Core bracing and glute engagement prevent excessive back arching
  • Arm length significantly affects optimal technique and load capacity
  • Strict press builds strength; push press develops power
  • Standing press is superior for overall development; seated for isolation
  • Train pressing 2x per week for optimal strength gains
  • Balance pressing with 1-1.5x pulling volume for shoulder health
  • Thoracic mobility is a prerequisite for safe overhead pressing

References

[1] Saeterbakken AH, Fimland MS. (2013). "Effects of Body Position and Loading Modality on Muscle Activity and Strength in Shoulder Presses." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(7):1824-31.

[2] Fees M, et al. (1998). "Upper Extremity Weight-Training Modifications for the Injured Athlete: A Clinical Perspective." American Journal of Sports Medicine, 26(5):732-42.

[3] Schick EE, et al. (2010). "A Comparison of Muscle Activation Between a Smith Machine and Free Weight Bench Press." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(3):779-84.

[4] Paoli A, et al. (2017). "Resistance Training with Single vs. Multi-joint Exercises at Equal Total Load Volume: Effects on Body Composition, Cardiorespiratory Fitness, and Muscle Strength." Frontiers in Physiology, 8:1105.

[5] Marchetti PH, Uchida MC. (2011). "Effects of the Single Leg Stance on Postural Control and Muscle Activation During the Barbell Shoulder Press Exercise." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 25:S97.

[6] Reinold MM, et al. (2009). "Current Concepts in the Scientific and Clinical Rationale Behind Exercises for Glenohumeral and Scapulothoracic Musculature." Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 39(2):105-17.

[7] Kibler WB, et al. (2013). "Clinical Implications of Scapular Dyskinesis in Shoulder Injury: The 2013 Consensus Statement from the 'Scapular Summit'." British Journal of Sports Medicine, 47(14):877-85.

[8] Duffey MJ, Challis JH. (2011). "Vertical and Lateral Forces Applied During the Press in Rugby Union Scrummaging." Sports Biomechanics, 10(4):1-14.

[10] Reinold MM, et al. (2010). "Shoulder Injuries in Overhead Athletes." Clinics in Sports Medicine, 29(3):349-64.

[11] Barnett C, et al. (1995). "Effects of Variations of the Bench Press Exercise on the EMG Activity of Five Shoulder Muscles." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 9(4):222-7.

[12] Lehman GJ. (2005). "The Influence of Grip Width and Forearm Pronation/Supination on Upper-Body Myoelectric Activity During the Flat Bench Press." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(3):587-91.

[13] Duffey MJ. (2008). "Biomechanical Analysis of the Bench Press." PhD thesis. Pennsylvania State University.

[14] Gourgoulis V, et al. (2000). "Three-Dimensional Kinematic Analysis of the Snatch of Elite Greek Weightlifters." Journal of Sports Sciences, 18(8):643-52.

[15] Kristiansen M, et al. (2015). "Inter-Individual Variability in the Kinematics of the Back Squat." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 29:S1.

[16] McKean MR, Burkett BJ. (2010). "The Relationship Between Joint Range of Motion, Muscular Strength, and Race Time for Subelite Flat Water Kayakers." Journal of Science and Medicine in Sport, 13(5):537-42.

[17] Cholewicki J, et al. (1996). "Mechanical Stability of the In Vivo Lumbar Spine: Implications for Injury and Chronic Low Back Pain." Clinical Biomechanics, 11(1):1-15.

[18] McGill SM, et al. (2003). "Coordination of Muscle Activity to Assure Stability of the Lumbar Spine." Journal of Electromyography and Kinesiology, 13(4):353-9.

[19] Santana JC, et al. (2007). "A Kinetic and Electromyographic Comparison of the Standing Cable Press and Bench Press." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 21(4):1271-9.

[20] Ludewig PM, Cook TM. (2000). "Alterations in Shoulder Kinematics and Associated Muscle Activity in People With Symptoms of Shoulder Impingement." Physical Therapy, 80(3):276-91.

[21] Cools AM, et al. (2014). "Rehabilitation of Scapular Dyskinesis: From the Office Worker to the Elite Overhead Athlete." British Journal of Sports Medicine, 48(8):692-7.

[24] Stone MH, et al. (1982). "A Hypothetical Model for Strength Training." Journal of Sports Medicine and Physical Fitness, 22(4):342-51.

[26] Seitz AL, et al. (2011). "Mechanisms of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: Intrinsic, Extrinsic, or Both?" Clinical Biomechanics, 26(1):1-12.

[27] Lewis JS, et al. (2015). "Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: Navigating the Diagnosis-Management Conundrum." Journal of Orthopaedic & Sports Physical Therapy, 45(11):923-37.

[28] McClure PW, et al. (2004). "Shoulder Function and 3-Dimensional Kinematics in People With Shoulder Impingement Syndrome Before and After a 6-Week Exercise Program." Physical Therapy, 84(9):832-48.

[29] Karduna AR, et al. (2001). "Dynamic Measurements of Three-Dimensional Scapular Kinematics: A Validation Study." Journal of Biomechanical Engineering, 123(2):184-90.

[30] Cools AM, et al. (2003). "Scapular Muscle Recruitment Patterns: Trapezius Muscle Latency with and Without Impingement Symptoms." American Journal of Sports Medicine, 31(4):542-9.

[33] Miller AE, et al. (1993). "Gender Differences in Strength and Muscle Fiber Characteristics." European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, 66(3):254-62.

[34] Churchill RS, et al. (2001). "Glenoid Size, Inclination, and Version: An Anatomic Study." Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery, 10(4):327-32.

[37] Borsa PA, et al. (2008). "Mobility and Stability Adaptations in the Shoulder of the Overhead Athlete: A Theoretical and Evidence-Based Perspective." Sports Medicine, 38(1):17-36.

[38] Miller AE, et al. (1993). "Gender Differences in Strength and Muscle Fiber Characteristics." European Journal of Applied Physiology, 66:254-62.

[39] Owens BD, et al. (2009). "Incidence of Shoulder Dislocation in the United States Military: Demographic Considerations from a High-Risk Population." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery American, 91(4):791-6.

[40] Saeterbakken AH, et al. (2017). "The Effects of Bench Press Variations in Competitive Athletes on Muscle Activity and Performance." Journal of Human Kinetics, 57:61-71.

[41] Soriano MA, et al. (2015). "The Optimal Load for Maximal Power Production During Lower-Body Resistance Exercises: A Meta-Analysis." Sports Medicine, 45(8):1191-205.

[43] Arandjelovic O. (2012). "Common Variants of the Resistance Training Overhead Press Exercise: A Review of Biomechanics, Relative Stimulus Patterns, and Injury Considerations." Facta Universitatis Physical Education and Sport, 10(4):307-16.

[44] McBride JM, et al. (1999). "A Comparison of Strength and Power Characteristics Between Power Lifters, Olympic Lifters, and Sprinters." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 13(1):58-66.

[45] Anderson K, Behm DG. (2005). "Trunk Muscle Activity Increases with Unstable Squat Movements." Canadian Journal of Applied Physiology, 30(1):33-45.

[46] Willardson JM, et al. (2009). "The Effect of Load Position on Core Muscle Activation and Stability During the Back Squat." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 23(2):428-33.

[47] Saeterbakken AH, Fimland MS. (2012). "Muscle Activity of the Core During Bilateral, Unilateral, Seated and Standing Resistance Exercise." European Journal of Applied Physiology, 112(5):1671-8.

[48] Welsch EA, et al. (2005). "Electromyographic Activity of the Pectoralis Major and Anterior Deltoid Muscles During Three Upper-Body Lifts." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 19(2):449-52.

[49] Uribe BP, et al. (2010). "Muscle Activation When Performing the Chest Press and Shoulder Press on a Stable Bench vs. a Swiss Ball." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 24(4):1028-33.

[50] Saeterbakken AH, et al. (2013). "Effects of Body Position and Loading Modality on Muscle Activity and Strength in Shoulder Presses." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 27(7):1824-31.

[55] Schoenfeld BJ, et al. (2016). "Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Measures of Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Sports Medicine, 46(11):1689-97.

[56] Grgic J, et al. (2018). "Effects of Resistance Training Frequency on Gains in Muscular Strength: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Sports Medicine, 48(5):1207-20.

[57] Schoenfeld BJ, et al. (2017). "Dose-Response Relationship Between Weekly Resistance Training Volume and Increases in Muscle Mass: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis." Journal of Sports Sciences, 35(11):1073-82.

[58] Baz-Valle E, et al. (2021). "Total Number of Sets as a Training Volume Quantification Method for Muscle Hypertrophy: A Systematic Review." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 35(3):870-8.

[61] Williams TD, et al. (2017). "Comparison of Periodized and Non-Periodized Resistance Training on Maximal Strength: A Meta-Analysis." Sports Medicine, 47(10):2083-100.

[62] Zourdos MC, et al. (2016). "Modified Daily Undulating Periodization Model Produces Greater Performance Than a Traditional Configuration in Powerlifters." Journal of Strength and Conditioning Research, 30(3):784-91.

[65] Junge A, et al. (2002). "Prevention of Soccer Injuries: A Prospective Intervention Study in Youth Amateur Players." American Journal of Sports Medicine, 30(5):652-9.

Want to master the overhead press with personalized coaching? Join our beta program and get access to AI-powered training that adapts to your unique biomechanics and helps you build powerful shoulders.

Marcus Chen
About the Author

Marcus Chen

Head Coach & Strength Specialist

Marcus is a certified strength and conditioning coach with over a decade of experience working with athletes and everyday lifters. He's passionate about evidence-based training and believes that understanding the science behind lifting helps people train smarter and achieve better results. When he's not coaching, you'll find him in the gym testing new programming approaches or diving into the latest strength research.

Related Articles